Interview with Susan Tepper about her book Dear Petrov at The Literary Tavern
Interview with Christopher D. DiCicco about his book So My Mother, She Lives in the Clouds at The Literary Tavern
Anne Enright The Forgotten Waltz
On Saturday mornings, I get ready for my volunteer shift at the West Falls-Colden Community Library and ask my husband how I look. He answers, “You look like a librarian,” then, after a kiss goodbye, he says, “Have fun petting your books.” This is the banal, comfortable bit of one marriage. As a community – as opposed to a county – library, it is all donations and volunteers. We get a great deal of books.
Last Saturday (October 18, 2015) I picked up four more, because you know, I don’t have enough at home. Interestingly, there was an ARC of Anne Enright’s “The Forgotten Waltz.” After shopping, I went home and thought I’d start all four, picking and choosing which to read. I grabbed several quitter sticks, I mean bookmarks, and curled up on the sofa. At some point, the cat joined me – I only know this because I had to rescue my pen from under her to jot down a page so I could refer back to it.
I had no intention of reading the book in one sitting or writing a review.
As you might expect, it’s about an affair. All the mess is there, but it’s a beautiful mess with exquisitely simple statements that made me gasp in their effectiveness. A few great ones are, “Even the ghosts were gone” in reference to returning to a hotel room on page 76.
“We talked about Aileen. Of course. We talked about his wife – because that is the thing about stolen love, it is important to know who it is you’re stealing it from.” Page 129
“I felt ancient. I felt like a child.” Page 148
The choicest pages were 158-166 where it all falls down and the lust is overtaken by reality. Two divorces are pending, the narrator’s mother has died and her sister finds out about the affair. Those pages ripped me open with the rawness of the repercussions.
I’m not a saint; I’ve had thoughts of straying. Big, huge thoughts, but out of a physical want instead of love. The protagonist fell in love with her lover. A classic, common mistake that I know better than to make. Were it easy to assume that a potential lover would not fall in love, I think I would have had a million affairs by now. I exaggerate, of course, but that’s the messiness of life. Love gets in the way of our best intentions.
This book, with excellent characters, felt fresh. It was an intimate experience, and made me think about my current situation and how fragile that domestic “thing” is that my husband and I have. It feels like tranquility some days and drudgery the next. It’s possibly the “ideal” but who wants to read about that? “The Forgotten Waltz” let me experience the crush without the blows. And as a bonus, I didn’t have to shave, so that truly is best way to experience an affair – in a sharp, well-written book. I must remember this…
Interview with Karen Stefano about her book The Secret Games of Words at The Literary Tavern
Interview with Beth Gilstrap about her book I Am Barbarella at The Literary Tavern
Interview with Kiri Pedersen about her story Sex for Groceries at r.kv.r.y. Quarterly Literary Journal
Stephen G. Eoannou: Muscle Cars at The Literary Tavern
Interview with Orlaith O’Sullivan about her story As Time Goes By at r.kv.r.y. Quarterly Literary Journal
Deborah Madar: Convergence
I recently completed a flash where the female narrator explains to a young man that he is not her type, but she’d been watching him and decided she wanted to be his lover. Not three days later do I walk into a store and–I know this part sounds like fiction, but in the candy aisle–I melted at the sight of a young man who is decidedly not my type, but man do I want him. Writing things and have them come true happens a lot to writers.
In a way, this phenomenon is explored in Deborah Madar’s Convergence. (ISBN 978-0692253137) At the heart of the story, a smart woman is enamored with the idea of synchronicity. Leigh Ann Fray writes a monthly column called “Convergences” where she talks about “the magic of fate and coincidence” bringing about “intriguing intertwinings.” Newly divorced from her husband, she is feeling the loss of her “co-author and historian of a quarter century.” Enter Phil, a college boyfriend who wants Leigh Ann’s help in recalling what had happened years ago when they were together.
What Phil remembers is that after their breakup, he went to Vietnam and experienced things no one ever should. It was those passages that made me put the book down for a while. I grew up in close proximity to someone who may have been the monster he was towards me because of his going through similar things. In movies, images of war and the idiotic destruction and challenges to one’s morality rarely affect me; it is after all, just a movie. Phil, a character in a book, made me feel his anguish and also made me think differently about people in my life and my interactions with them. For a book to do that–to someone who has read extensively–is a rare and impressive feat.
It is hard to write a review about this novel without referencing my own life–past and present.
Leigh Ann, as a character, is someone I didn’t like very much but I fear my dislike for her is based on what I call the “Mia Syndrome.” Long before she hooked up with Woody, I instinctively did not like Mia Farrow. I can’t tell you why, I just did. “The Purple Rose of Cairo” is a favorite film of mine–except for her. Frustrated with myself, I forced myself to find and read a biography of Mia. Once I did, I realized the reason I didn’t like her was that we were a lot alike. I had looked at the enemy and she was similar to me.
I volunteer at a library and there is someone who comes in when I’m working and chats me up. It’s flattering. I humorously refer to this person as “my stalker.” My coworkers have expressed unease about this person; I dismiss their fears feeling–in my heart–that this person will not harm me. Leigh Ann feels the same way about a person in “Convergences” which has me reconsidering my take on a situation that I didn’t think was that big of a deal.
Again, for a book to make me think–and rethink–parts of my own life is incredibly unusual. Kudos to Deborah Madar for writing that well in a first novel. Is the book perfect? No, but my issues with it–most irritatingly not giving Phil a name in the first chapter and the story about the unnamed woman in Chapter 13 who came out of nowhere to illustrate a point but could have been a larger and more interesting character–aren’t the worst sins for any book to commit.
I will let you find out about Charlotte on your lonesome. She is so perfectly bizarre and well-constructed that I’m still awed by her construct. Peter, the ex-husband is not bad either. Don’t get me wrong, these are “bad” characters but Madar brings them to life in an exquisite fashion–I felt that I knew them and if I saw them on the streets of Ellicottville, I would not be surprised. The clear-cut writing in those passages more than makes up for those flaws I mention.
It’s an interesting book.
Clifford Garstang: What the Zhang Boys Know
Coming off NaNo can leave a writer in need of calm and salve. On the first, which was a Sunday, I rested. On the second, I cleaned and on the third I had made a commitment to read and reread all of the stories in my queue. When I signed in to the site, it was cleared by the Editor-in-Chief. That filled me with relief as there were several stories I was hemming and hawwing about–those darlings that must be killed–the “not quite right for us at this time” submissions.
Gaining the time I’d mentally set aside for reading, I finished a short story in Harper’s about a writing instructor on a cruise ship, then a story in A Public Space called “Debt” by Sana Krasikov. As it happens, one story informed the next, much like eating courses at a meal. I’d had appetizers and soup, so when I picked up Clifford Garstang’s What the Zhang Boys Know, it didn’t surprise me that I’d found the entrée.
For the most part, the twelve stories are well balanced and it has a genuinely interesting flow. The residents of Nanking Mansion often base their opinions of others on appearances, which Suzanna in “The Game of Love,” warns against. While her ex-lover is across the street watching her, she knows that “he is blind to the woman she has always wanted to be.” I loved that line, as I know I’m capable of overlooking other people’s growth. Feng-qi in “The Shrine to His Ancestors” concludes that “life was an ocean of change over which he had no control.” The pairings, the visitors, the little dogs gone missing all exemplify the changes taking place in the city, the building itself, and the people housed inside.
I can’t say I liked every story, as the title story seemed contrived. I understand why it was included, but as I don’t recall Jessica mentioning that the Zhang Boy’s left on an adventure to find their mother, or that Feng-qi does either, so Simon and Wesley’s story falls short in my eyes. I would have preferred a subtler tale from these two fine young men whom I’d come to know and genuinely like. One story out of twelve falling short is knocking it out of the park, though.
The arrangement of the stories is far superior to the way Tom Rachman’s The Imperfectionists was structured. That was the last “novel told in short stories” I’ve read straight through. I know part of my disappointment in Rachman’s book was from the hype it received. I knew Clifford Garstang was awarded a prize for his book recently–a form of “hype”–yet I was delighted with these characters and their stories. The 2013 Library of Virginia Award for Fiction was well deserved. The final stories are grouped in a lovely way and I was reminded of the stoicism of Buck’s The Good Earth.
This book was purchased at AWP this spring. I still have more books from then to go through, so I probably won’t have a chance to reread any of these stories for a while, but the characters, their paintings, sculptures, and the hole in the wall that lets in the pigeons will stay with me.
T. J. Forrester: Black Heart on the Appalachian Trail
Black Heart on the Appalachian Trail is full of unexpected characters on a journey none thought they would take. It is a dark, honest novel where Simone Decker’s theory that each human is born with a flaw in their DNA is raised in every chapter. Are people just running through a genetic program they cannot alter and that makes them do what they do? Is change even possible?
Newly released prisoner Taz Chavis is ready to reject the old patterns that led to his spending time in prison. A book he read about the Appalachian Trail forms the idea that he could do it. The death of his father and a small inheritance gives him the means.
People around the trail, those living along the edges blend with the thru-hikers. The owners of a B&B go through hell and back while hikers pitch tents at the end of their lawn. A couple in their later years are thrown for not one loop, but several. A young couple set up rigid boundaries of what will and will not happen in their future in regards to having children. Some people in these stories accept change, some demand it but they all face fears and insecurities with verve.
I’m not a hiker/walker/trail person. A few years ago my husband, his brother and two friends went through part of the S.T.S. in Pennsylvania. I didn’t understand the appeal, but after reading this novel, I now have a sense of what seeing a trail to the end means. As Taz, Simone and Richard approached the Katahdin summit, I was just as anxious as they were. What would happen at the end? What comes after the long journey of sublime sensations? I finished the book last night. It’s a book I hated to see end, and one I’ll read again. I know of no higher praise than that.